5 SIMPLE TECHNIQUES FOR H4831SC LOAD DATA

5 Simple Techniques For h4831sc load data

5 Simple Techniques For h4831sc load data

Blog Article

Since there won't seem like any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can some of you supply a starting point with this combination and items to think about when Performing this Load up?

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or short Slice. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation through the powder actions additional smoothly, assisting to ease the continual chopping of granules.

WARNING: This product can expose you to guide, which is thought to your Condition of California to result in cancer and birth defects or other reproductive hurt. For more info head over to – .

Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or regular) and ton that you are working with even though. Similar burn up charge does not imply it's going to behave "exactly" precisely the same. I have noticed about 100 fps difference between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

INgunner54 explained: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some teams.

Did you at any time check out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with normal chamber. Wanting to know What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a restricted supply of Varget, and a large amount additional offered H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads almost solely, since that is certainly what the rifles shoot the best.

Im under the knowing I wish to use h4831sc. I have browse that these powders are equivalent Other than the shorter grain sizing of your sc. h4831sc load data Should I still be looking out for h4381sc?

Chances are you'll either: one) Continue and also have the firearm(s) outlined beneath instantly faraway from your searching cart:

In addition it goes on to mention that because of the fshorter grains, h4831 vs h4831sc that load density might be a little increased.

This really is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an previous thread. Remember to look at developing a new thread.

It can be probable that no even further discussion is required, in which circumstance we propose starting off a different thread. If even so you're feeling your response is necessary it is possible to nevertheless do so.

Many of the old Lyman data just mentioned IMR 4831, which was surplus military services powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.

I sawed one particular in 50 % to see how thick the jackets had been, and so they have been quickly 2 times as thick as a 50-grain hollow stage was. Ditto for your 64-grain Electricity Stage, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know everything in the slightest degree with regards to the 223. I question h4831sc load data that you're going to get anyplace with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to understand how it goes.

Report this page